The U.S. Supreme Court denied Johnson & Johnson’s petition to have a $140 million jury verdict reviewed in a failure-to-warn case involving a teenage girl who developed a serious skin reaction blamed on the company’s Children’s Motrin. Johnson & Johnson had argued that claims made by Samantha Reckis and her parents that the over-the-counter painkiller gave her a painful and blistering skin condition should have been preempted by the 2009 Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. Levine, which found that drug makers cannot be held liable for not including a label that “clear evidence” indicates the FDA would not have ... Read More
Righting Injustice is published by the Beasley Allen Law Firm. If you are interested in a free legal consultation, please take a few moments to fill out the contact form with as many details as possible. The more information you provide us, the better we can evaluate your claim.